Connect with us

News

Why Abdulrasheed Maina Failed To Meet Bail Condition -Lawyer

Published

on

Faisal Maina

Afam Osigwe, the lawyer to former chairman of the Pension Reform Task Team (PRTT) Abdulrasheed Maina,  has revealed why he is yet to meet his bail conditions.

According to the lawyer, Maina is  finding it hard to fulfill his bail conditions.

Osigwe revealed this at the resumed hearing of the suit on Monday January 13, calling for a bail variation application for his client. He also disclosed that two senators who indicated interest to stand as sureties, said they neither have properties in either Asokoro or Maitama worth the amount specified by the court

Maina who is standing trial on 12-count charge bordering on money laundering, was granted a N1 billion bail after being arraigned before Justice Okon Abang.

He was also ordered to deposit all his travel passports, including American, Nigerian and diplomatic passports. Maine was also asked to provide sureties with properties worth N500m naira each.

Justice Abang directed that the sureties must have landed properties fully developed in Asokoro or Maitama in Abuja and must be serving senators with no criminal case in court.

 

 

 

When asked if he obtained documents containing the information of landowners in Abuja from the land registry, Maina’s lawyer said ‘No’ as the land registry treats such documents as confidential.

 

Osigwe further said;

 

“To even conduct a search on an identified property, the Abuja Geographic Information Systems (AGIS), would not permit you to do so unless you produce the original titled document together with a letter of consent.

“When you approach a person to be your surety and the person says I don’t have this property, I think it would be disrespectful to go behind investigating whether what the person has told you is true.”

 

Responding to the application, Justice Okon Abang stated that Maina failed to disprove claims of being a flight risk defendant as he no longer resides in Abuja. He also averred that documents backing the claims of the potential sureties should have been brought to court.

 

Okon said;

 

“The court did not fix those conditions for fun. The court has reasons for imposing those conditions. So, if you want the court to vary it, convincingly, you have to establish the fact that the applicant is unable to comply with those conditions.”

 

Maina’s counsel however defended his client by revealing that his travel passports has already been seized by EFCC and deposited before a high court in Gwagwalada.

 

The case was adjourned till Tuesday January 14, for resumed hearing on the former PRTT boss’ bail application.

Share
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Facebook

Trending

Copyright © 2019, February13 Media